Woffling On

Monday, February 27, 2006

Alexa Ranking Update for 27 February 2006

OK, I know this is getting boring, but I've explained the situation before, so I'm just getting on with the report.

Here are the results for today.

www.The-Health-Gazette.com moved up from: 85,026 to: 84,307 (59,117)

www.Healthy-Vitamin-Choice.com moved down from: 130,743 to: 135,008 (75,943)

www.Herb-Health-Guide.com moved down from: 142,207 to: 143,626 (78,462)

www.Education4Skills.com moved down from: 150,120 to: 156,504 (150,120)

www.HealthProductsSite.com moved down from: 147,166 to: 149,290 (105,672)

www.HealthArticleBank.com moved up from: 225,615 to: 212,731*

* indicates a new highest high
( ) indicates highest high to date

Well, not a very positive update, except for the new high on the one site. All others seem to have stumbled.

Sunday, February 26, 2006

Pain Management Article on New Article Site

I want to announce a new article site. It turns out I was the first person to have an article accepted and published there. Woohoo!

The site is MarketingArticleBank.com and it's a brand new article directory or database of documents written by authors seeking to spread the word about something, usually their business or website. I was in the know, but I don't think anyone else has found it yet.

I published an article on a novel pain management technique. If you have an interest in controlling or treating pain just go and take a quick look. If you find it useful you can post it on the web, so long as you follow the simple rules of not changing it and keeping it all intact, including my active links.

Anyway, I just wanted to mention it here so go take a look if you're interested. Click the link above and you'll soon find my article.

Thursday, February 23, 2006

Alexa Ranking Update for 23 February 2006

Looks to have been a quick update again. Already!

Here are the results for today.

www.The-Health-Gazette.com moved up from: 85,238 to: 85,026 (59,117)

www.Healthy-Vitamin-Choice.com moved up from: 132,168 to: 130,743 (75,943)

www.Herb-Health-Guide.com moved up from: 143,410 to: 142,207 (78,462)

www.Education4Skills.com moved up from: 152,454 to: 150,120*

www.HealthProductsSite.com moved down from: 146,421 to: 147,166 (105,672)

www.HealthArticleBank.com moved up from: 230,553 to: 225,615 (215,945)

* indicates a new highest high
( ) indicates highest high to date

Not a lot happening really, just some minor changes. At least there are no precipitous falls.

Monday, February 20, 2006

Alexa Ranking Update for 20 February 2006

Back to the old schedule of updates it would seem.

Here are the results for today.

www.The-Health-Gazette.com moved up from: 85,625 to: 85,238 (59,117)

www.Healthy-Vitamin-Choice.com moved down from: 131,856 to: 132,168 (75,943)

www.Herb-Health-Guide.com moved down from: 143,070 to: 143,410 (78,462)

www.Education4Skills.com moved up from: 156,392 to: 152,454*

www.HealthProductsSite.com moved down from: 144,017 to: 146,421 (105,672)

www.HealthArticleBank.com moved up from: 241,974 to: 230,553 (215,945)

* indicates a new highest high
( ) indicates highest high to date

Not a lot happening really, just some minor changes. At least there are no precipitous falls.

Have a great week ans stay well.

Friday, February 17, 2006

Aussies Develop Successful Human Bird Flu Vaccine

Australia's Commonwealth Serum Laboratories (CSL) announced today that it has successfully developed and tested a vaccine against the much hyped and feared H5N1 avian influenza (so-called "bird flu") virus strain in humans. A CSL spokesperson claimed to have already validated effectiveness of the vaccine but no details have been provided on precisely how they did this.

Protection involves a course of two vaccine injections and one immune system booster of an unspecified type. Testing is now proceding on children and the elderly to ensure a suitable protocol will be available for all age ranges.

The CSL spokesperson said the company could develop large scale vaccination batches within 6 weeks if needed.

My position against vaccination is well documented. I am also against the hype that has been deliberately orchestrated by those profiting from the concern, fear and terror engendered by the "bird flu" hysteria. Perhaps now that a reputable and trustworthy supplier has actually developed an effective vaccine and is finalising a set of protocols we can hope for some reduction in many people's anxiety.

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Alexa Ranking Update for 16 February 2006

Ok, just quickly now, it appears that another quick update has been performed already.

Here are the results for today.

www.The-Health-Gazette.com moved up from: 87,687 to: 85,625 (59,117)

www.Healthy-Vitamin-Choice.com moved down from: 128,803 to: 131,856 (75,943)

www.Herb-Health-Guide.com moved down from: 140,686 to: 143,070 (78,462)

www.Education4Skills.com moved up from: 156,670 to: 156,392 (155,522)

www.HealthProductsSite.com moved down from: 142,628 to: 144,017 (105,672)

www.HealthArticleBank.com moved up from: 248,840 to: 241,974 (215,945)

* indicates a new highest high
( ) indicates highest high to date

Once again, not much change really. Some of the falls from best rankings do seem disappointing.

Have a good weekend readers...

Monday, February 13, 2006

Alexa Ranking Update for 13 February 2006

Ok, just quickly now...

Here are the results for today.

www.The-Health-Gazette.com moved up from: 88,112 to: 87,687 (59,117)

www.Healthy-Vitamin-Choice.com moved down from: 126,884 to: 128,803 (75,943)

www.Herb-Health-Guide.com moved down from: 139,348 to: 140,686 (78,462)

www.Education4Skills.com moved up from: 159,146 to: 156,670 (155,522)

www.HealthProductsSite.com moved up from: 142,740 to: 142,628 (105,672)

www.HealthArticleBank.com moved up from: 249,542 to: 248,840 (215,945)

* indicates a new highest high
( ) indicates highest high to date

Again, not much change really.

Have a good week readers...

Friday, February 10, 2006

Women's Health Initiative A Farcical Waste

The following article reprinted from The Health Gazette certainly won't get the exposure all of the reports giving space to the researchers involved will get, but if you are reading it now, at least that's one more person who may stop and think a little about the abuse of women that the Women's Health Initiative actually represents. Any way, here it is.

How disappointing. The grandiose Women's Health Initiative appears to be a complete misnomer. Well, to be fair, it is about women so complete may be a tad strong. It sure isn't about health though and it definitely lacked initiative, among other things.

The $628-million federally funded project involves more than 161,000 women -- 18% of them minorities, ages 50 to 79. It is widely billed as the largest, most comprehensive research study of women's health at midlife in the United States, which only goes to show that women's health is sadly neglected. The research program started in 1992. It aims to provide information about whether hormone, calcium and vitamin D supplements or a low-fat diet reduce the risk of heart disease, cancer and osteoporosis in U.S. women after menopause.

Unfortunately it was poorly informed, designed and managed and though at times it appears to have amounted to little more than a farce, it did usefully conclude what many have always said, that hormone replacement therapy did more harm than good and that estrogen alone did not provide enough health benefits. Both segments of the hormone therapy trial had to be stopped early, in 2002 and 2004, because of increased risk of stroke, blood clots and breast cancer.

The fuss in the press today is about the findings in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reporting the outcome of the diet component of the "Initiative". This portion of the ongoing study included 48,835 women. The conclusions are that there is:

  • No significant differences in heart disease and stroke between women following a low-fat diet compared to those who did not.
  • A modest reduction in risk of breast cancer, but not high enough to be statistically significant.
  • No significant difference in colon cancer. Those with the healthier diet did have fewer polyps and benign tumors, but there's no telling if that will mean less colon cancer over time.

So, in short, the conclusion is that a low-fat diet isn't enough to protect women aged 50 to 79 from heart disease, colon cancer or breast cancer. Unfortunately, whether any of these findings are correct or not is impossible to tell from this ill-conceived study.

As the article in JAMA rightly points out, there are weaknesses in the study. I would call them fatal flaws. For example, consider the following.

It's possible that not enough women were able to achieve the required 20 percent dietary fat goal. At year six, the low-fat group got 29 percent of calories from fat, indicating that a fundamental difference that was intended to exist between the experimental and control groups according to the design, simply didn't exist.

The study did not offer sufficient guidelines about so-called bad fats, such as saturated or trans fats found in processed foods. Targeting saturated and trans fats may have been expected to pay off more in fewer heart attacks.

Astonishingly, exercise was not part of the study yet it may make a difference when combined with a low-fat diet. I believe this raises doubts about the ethical standing of the study.

Perhaps the study simply started too late in life and the changes need to be implemented well prior to the menopausal years.

Perhaps it takes longer for a diet-alone change to make a difference. The women were followed for an average of eight years.

Many women preferred fruits to vegetables. Vegetables might provide better protection but such details were not considered.

The diet study is one of the three clinical trials that make up the Women's Health Initiative. Results of the third trial, studying the effects of calcium and vitamin D supplements on osteoporosis-related bone fractures and on colorectal cancer, will be published in the New England Journal of Medicine next week.

Interestingly, according to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, in 1977, women consumed 45.5 percent of their calories from fat. This consumption of dietary fat fell to 35.9 percent in 1987 and to 33 percent in 2000. These figures are not exclusively for women aged 50 to 79 but they do represent a substantial reduction. However, deaths in women from heart disease, colon cancer and breast cancer have not declined.

To address these risks in both men and women a healthy lifestyle is required and that requires rather more than a half-hearted reduction in some fats in an otherwise uncontrolled, conventional diet. That researchers wasted so much funding and knowingly exposed so many women to uncontrolled risks when quality health education could instead have been provided is tragic. The Women's Health Initiative seems to have been an exercise in political grandstanding and academic career-building and in both cases the kudos is undeserved.

Thursday, February 09, 2006

Alexa Ranking Update for 9 February 2006

This Alexa ranking update caught me by surprise. There was an update quite recently and after the previous long period between updates I thought this one would be some time off. But here it is, ready or not!

Here are the results for today.

www.The-Health-Gazette.com moved up from: 88,388 to: 88,112 (59,117)

www.Healthy-Vitamin-Choice.com moved down from: 125,012 to: 126,884 (75,943)

www.Herb-Health-Guide.com moved down from: 136,991 to: 139,348 (78,462)

www.Education4Skills.com moved up from: 161,094 to: 159,146 (155,522)

www.HealthProductsSite.com moved down from: 142,688 to: 142,740 (105,672)

www.HealthArticleBank.com moved up from: 261,762 to: 249,542 (215,945)

* indicates a new highest high
( ) indicates highest high to date

Well, not much change really. After my last post pointing out how far the rankings had dropped I had to laugh when I browsed to this site today and saw a Google add that said "Still biting your nails?". Fortunately I have a healthy sense of humor!

Have a good week readers...

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Interesting Way To Uncover A Medical Breakthrough

This is something I swiped from the Health Gazette. I think it's pretty interesting, see what you think.


Here is a story about a breakthrough in medical science. It is actually part of a sales page for a specialized investment adviser's service. I will place a link to the full copy below but please note that I am not affiliated with this service in any way and I am not endorsing it by sharing this with you. The copy is so well written and inherently interesting however, I thought you might find it worth your time. If you are an investor it may well be well worth your time to read the full pitch.

Gloria Richards never expected to go blind.

But like 20% of all men and women over 65, she had macular degeneration, which often leads to age-related blindness.

No more reading. No more golf. No more weekly bridge parties with the girls.

Life as Gloria knew it, would be over.

Then her doctor told her about a brand-new treatment -- a breakthrough technology so important to the medical community that it was recently featured over 1,625 times in scholarly scientific journals, like Scientific American, Science magazine, and in the academic reports of The National Academy of the Sciences.

Gloria’s doctor asked if she wanted to be one of the first to try this new treatment. Without hesitation, Gloria jumped at the chance.

The result?

Put simply, Gloria experienced a miracle.

She can see... with no drugs, no lasers, no surgery, and no side effects.

Dr. Philip A. Sharp, MIT professor and Nobel Prize-winner in medicine says of this technology, called RNA interference, "It’s the most important and exciting breakthrough of the decade, perhaps multiple decades."

In fact, RNA interference is so powerful that Technology Review magazine listed it as one of the "10 emerging technologies that will change your world." That’s because RNA interference doesn’t treat just macular degeneration -- it can be used to shut off nearly any disease in the human body -- just like shutting off a light switch.

Sounds unbelievable, right? I’d agree, but I’ve seen the proof for myself. This technology is as real as they come -- because it’s being put to practical use right now.

I’ll tell you all about how it works in just a moment.

You see, I’ve spent the past 3 years investigating this new technology first hand. I’ve met with over a half-dozen infectious disease experts, attended dozens of industry conferences, and visited top-level executives and CEOs. In short, this new technology is so powerful -- its applications are practically unlimited...

  • "There’s no doubt about it!!! ...RNA interference is a cure for Huntington’s disease and other expanded repeat diseases!!!"

-- Hereditary Disease Foundation, Official Website

  • "Many RNA interference companies are planning to tackle viral diseases, including hepatitis C, RSV, and HIV."

-- Financial Times, September 2005

  • "...Researchers at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center have developed a way to use RNA interference so that it permanently hampers breast cancer development."

-- Biotechnology Magazine, April 2005

It all began in a tiny greenhouse just outside San Francisco...

In 1986 a scientist named Richard Jorgenson was attempting to make the world’s most dazzling flower -- the deepest purple of petunias.

To do this, he added an extra purple-making gene to an already purple petunia.

Sounds logical, right?

But, unexpectedly, after adding the extra gene for purple, the flower turned bright white.

This tiny white petunia caused one of the biggest scientific mysteries in recent history. The world’s best and brightest scientists scurried to solve the puzzle...

Why does a purple flower turn white when an extra gene for purple is added?

This riddle went unsolved for more than a decade.

Then in 1998, 2 scientists, Dr. Craig Mello of The University Massachusetts and Dr. Andrew Fire of the Carnegie Institute in Washington, finally figured it out -- putting an end the decade long puzzle.

The riddle is solved!

When Richard Jorgenson added that extra purple gene to the petunia, he unknowingly activated an ancient defense mechanism that exists in every living cell.

Two scientists -- doctors Craig Mello and Andrew Fire -- discovered this process in 1998 -- solving the "great petunia riddle" -- and coined the term RNA interference.

How does RNA interference work?

When Jorgenson inserted that extra purple-producing gene into the tiny petunia, he activated a secret security device -- an enzyme, scientists call "the dicer." It’s called "the dicer" because it can literally "chop up" any disease, virus, bacteria, or fungus.

And that was the secret to discovering RNA interference. The dicer (or RNA interference) has to be activated to work -- or spurred into action. That’s why it took so long to discover this medical technology.

Back in Jorgenson’s white petunia, the dicer was activated when the unfamiliar invader (the extra purple gene) invaded the cell. Thinking it was a virus, "the dicer" kicked in -- and literally shut down all color producing genes to protect the flower from the foreign substance. Likewise, Jorgenson got a white flower -- one with no color.

In 2002, Thomas Tuschl, working out of the Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry in Gottingen, Germany, discovered that RNA interference works in human cells.

Remember how Richard Jorgenson destroyed ALL color producing genes in a flower by inserting an extra color-producing gene? Well, Tuschl discovered that this same process works to destroy real human diseases.

According to The London Times, "The diseases that stand to benefit from RNA interference include Alzheimer’s, breast cancer, leukemia, schizophrenia, and many, many more."

The prestigious journal, Science magazine, hailed this discovery the #1 scientific breakthrough of the year.

It boils down to this: "An ancient immune system hiding in our genes has the power to switch off genes at will. We could soon be harnessing this awesome force to stop cancer and viruses dead," reports New Science magazine.

Tuschl found that if doctors want to destroy a particular disease, all they have to do is insert an "evil twin" of that disease to activate the dicer -- just like Jorgenson did in the petunia.

Think of RNA interference as "a virus for the virus."

Now, let’s say you want to treat macular degeneration.

Doctors simply insert an "evil twin" of the disease that reads, "make more blood vessels" underneath the retina -- that’s what causes the vision impairment. The dicer will "come alive," see that something is not quite right, and destroy genes that are making extra blood vessels.

And that’s exactly how Gloria Richard’s blinding eyes were healed.

Source: Sales copy for an investment advisory service run by Dave Lashmet available here:

http://www.stansberryonline.com/dil/20060202-DIL-JOR.asp?pcode=EDILG201&alias= 20060204&alias=launch&o=334443&u=12459167&l=784093

It is very high-tech and interventionist treatment and Big Pharma will be all over it, I'm sure. However, it pays to maintain balance and an open mind so for now I think this is something well worth keeping an eye on. Some otherwise untreatable diseases may be dealt a blow by such therapies and if the unwanted side effects can be genuinely kept to a minimum then this may be very welcome indeed.

I do find it fascinating that an apparently natural intracellular defence system has been uncovered in this quite recent research. I wonder how many other natural systems there are that natural therapists have been activating with their treatments for thousands of years, not knowing exactly how their treatments worked, but knowing that they work. How many more are to be discovered and hopefully better appreciated and understood?

I must say too, that discovering a treatment that involves inserting an "evil twin" sounds very much like the homeopathic principle of "like cures like". Who knows, perhaps homeopathic medicines have been activating this previously unknown intracellular "immune system," or yet another one like it, at an energy level for years.

Monday, February 06, 2006

Alexa Ranking Update 6 February 2006

The frequent Alexa updates came to a halt and it has been quite some time since the last one. The passage of time didn't help much though, as you can see below.

Here are the results for today.

www.The-Health-Gazette.com moved down from: 87,665 to: 88,388 (59,117)

www.Healthy-Vitamin-Choice.com moved down from: 110,780 to: 125,012 (75,943)

www.Herb-Health-Guide.com moved down from: 117,337 to: 136,991 (78,462)

www.Education4Skills.com moved up from: 165,499 to: 161,094 (155,522)

www.HealthProductsSite.com moved down from: 125,959 to: 142,688 (105,672)

www.HealthArticleBank.com moved down from: 250,239 to: 261,762 (215,945)

* indicates a new highest high
( ) indicates highest high to date

Yes, the declines have largely continued, even accelerated. Did someone say these rankings are purely for entertainment value?

Saturday, February 04, 2006

People As Lab Rats For The FDA

The drugs approved as safe for marketing and prescription to consumers in the U.S. are constantly monitored by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The monitoring system is seriously flawed, being little more than the next stage of drug testing "in the wild". This effectively reduces consumers to the level of "lab rat" as their experiences, or some of them anyway, are recognized and reported to the FDA.

If consumers grin-and-bear-it through some unwanted reaction and hence it is not reported or if for any other reason it is not conveyed to the FDA, it will not contribute to knowledge of the drug's performance. Equally, if the reaction is already well documented it will frequently go unreported.

Nevertheless, every month the FDA releases one more month's worth of changes to the Contraindications, Boxed Warnings, Warnings, Precautions and Adverse Reactions information associated with the drugs and medical equipment it has previously approved. This data is released in a quite timely fashion actually, but monthly summaries are provided in arrears. For example, the November 2005 summary has just been released.

In this November data some 55 products are included. Eight Contraindcation updates were made, three Boxed Warning updates, 14 Warnings updates, 41 Precautions updates and 17 Adverse Reactions updates. That's a lot of updates and they represent a lot of problems associated with these approved products. I think this is actually just the tip of the iceberg.

While much of the material is best suited to medical or health professional consumption, there is some value for anyone in perusing the data. In any event, take a look at the scope and the types of problems that the FDA is comfortable continuing to expose consumers to. Their Summary is presented below.

More details about the updated drugs may be found in the remainder of this article.

Friday, February 03, 2006

Natural Antibiotics

I posted the following article at The Health Gazette and on reading through it quickly felt it was a woffle, so Im posting it here too!!


I regularly make references to using natural antibiotics for bacterial infections in preference to the synthetic drugs from the pharmaceutical companies. There are some very good reasons for this.

Every single prescription antibiotic from the drug companies carries significant risks. To exemplify, just some of the direct risks to the consumer include:

  • Allergic reactions ranging from a mild rash to severe anaphylaxis resulting in death.
  • Mild to severe and debilitating gastrointestinal upset, most of which patients are encouraged to put up with unless very severe.
  • Serious damage such as permanent deafness resulting from damage to the acoustic nerve, in the case of intravenous gentamycin, for example.

Another type of risk to the consumer is being prescribed an antibiotic that increases risk but conveys no benefit whatsoever (not including rare cases where prophylaxis can be justified). This includes:

  • When a viral illness or allergy is seen but no bacterial infection is present (a very common occurrence, with doctors who over prescribe and mis-prescribe for various reasons).
  • When an incorrect antibiotic is prescribed which is not specific for the particular infecting organism.

Other risks apply to the patient and everyone else. These are the risks that the medical profession has to accept ultimate responsibility for. These relate to the massive problem caused by over reliance and indiscriminate prescription of antibiotics resulting in development of so-called super bugs, bacteria that are resistant to one or more antibiotic groups.

This population-wide risk is quite serious. It means that very dangerous bacteria have been developed, antibiotics that may have been helpful have been rendered useless and in response to the evolving strains of bacteria, the drug makers have responded with ever more powerful -- and more dangerous -- antibiotics. The results to date have had devestating consequences and many lives have been lost as a result.

Interestingly, the above problems are virtually unheard of when natural antibiotics are used instead of pharmaceuticals. The worst I have encountered in decades is some very mild irritation with my favorite topical antibiotic and some very minor gastric upset with my favorite oral antibiotics. These risks are entirely justified given the efficacy of the treatment and absence of the major risks cited above.

So what are these natural antibiotics? Well, there are plenty, but here are just a few.

My favorite topical antibiotic is tea tree oil. It is a remarkable substance derived from the leaves of the native Australian Melaleuca alternifolia tree. Unlike conventional antibiotics tea tree oil is effective against yeasts and fungi in addition to bacterial infections and I have even used it very successfully on viral erruptions.

For example, it has proven effective in bacterial conditions as diverse as acne, throat infections, halitosis (from infections in the oral cavity) and wound infections. It is also effective in treating conditions such as athlete's foot, jock itch, ringworm, fungal infections of the toenails or fingernails and yeast infections. Applied to cold sores, a manifestation of herpes viral infection, either during the warning tingling stage or early after erruption, it is extremely effective (just keep it out of your eyes).

If using tea tree oil, be sure that you have 100% pure tea tree oil. For most applications use 5-15% solutions daily, whether applied to the exterior or used as a gargle or mouthwash (don't swallow) or douche. In the case of herpes I disregard some people's advice and use a neat strength applied very specifically to the affected area with a cotton bud. Everyone should have a bottle of tea tree oil at home. Just remember to store it securely away from children because it is a concentrated product, though every bottle I've ever seen has had a secure tamper-proof cap.

Notice that while oral pharmaceutical antibiotics can be very hit and miss antibacterials, they have no effect against viral, fungal or yeast infections. Indeed, they often are the cause of overgrowths of yeasts. This is because, whether or not they kill the infecting organism, they always kill good bacteria which keep these in check, thereby allowing yeasts and undesirable bacteria to flourish.

The natural antibiotics don't have this problem. Not only do they tend not to kill the desirable bacteria, avoiding the overgrowth problem, several also are actually effective against the other types of organisms. So instead of having undesirable side effects they have bonus beneficial effects. Let's consider some examples.

The first is grape seed extract (GSE). I will allow the following quote to explain the usefulness of GSE because it presents the use of a natural antibiotic to deal with antibiotic-resistant infections. This illustrates the effectiveness and serves to introduce the care with which natural antibiotics should be used. Note the recommended treatment regimen in the second paragraph.

There are many herbs and essential oils that kill enterococcus, staphylococcus and other bacteria as well as viruses, which antibiotics are unable to treat. One of the most popular is grapefruit seed extract, or GSE, made from the seeds and connecting tissue of citrus fruit. In the October 1996 edition of his Alternatives newsletter (Mountain Home Publishing, 1201 Seven Locks Road, Rockville, MD 20854), David G. Williams, D.C., described an elderly woman with VRE who was successfully treated for five days with a product that contains 100 mg grapefruit seed extract, 200 mg Artemisia annua (annual wormwood or sweet Annie) and 200 mg Echinacea angustifolia, 1 capsule 3 times daily. After repeated cultures showed her to be free of the VRE infection, two other VRE patients received the same treatment. Because conventional medicine has nothing to offer VRE patients, this is exciting news -- but, as Williams explained, it isn't news you're likely to read outside of his publication, for the physicians using this unapproved, unconventional therapy have no interest in creating a medical controversy by reporting their results. "If you have any upcoming surgery or hospital stays, or if you work in a hospital setting," he wrote, "I would suggest keeping some of this [type of]product around. I would also consider pre-dosing 3 or 4 days prior to any surgery, as well as taking the product for a week or so following the procedure."

Although pathogens have a more difficult time adapting to natural products, which have a more complex molecular structure than pharmaceutical chemicals, daily exposure might eventually allow some microbes to survive, mutate and become resistant to grapefruit seed extract, just as they are resistant to penicillin and other antibiotics. Although GSE is believed to be free of adverse side effects, large doses over time may disrupt the body's balance of beneficial bacteria. Two healthcare professionals of my acquaintance have mentioned seeing this disruption in people who have taken large doses of grapefruit seed extract for a month or more. Any herb that is used on a daily basis may become less effective when needed. Alternating grapefruit seed extract with other antiseptic herbs is an effective strategy. So is taking these herbs in "courses," in which a product is taken for several days and then stopped for a day or two before being resumed (five days on and two days off is a popular regimen), for no more than a month or six weeks before being replaced by another herb.

Puotinen, C.J. Natural solutions to drug-resistant infections, Well Being Journal, 9,1, January/February 2000.

The next natural antibiotic is at least equally effective as an antiviral agent and also eliminates fungal and yeast infections. It is olive leaf extract (OLE). When early investigation by the pharmaceutical industry encountered problems they lost interest. Those problems have been solved and OLE is now used for a wide variety of health benefits besides those mentioned here. The following quote demonstrates the broad spectrum of anti-viral and anti-bacterial effectiveness.

... the researchers at Upjohn found calcium elenolate effective in test tube experiments against the following viruses: herpes, vaccinia, pseudorabies, Newcastle, Coxsacloe A 21, encepthlomyocarditis, polio 1, 2, and 3, vesicular stomititus, sindbis, reovirus, Moloney Murine leukemia, Rauscher Murine leukemia, Moloney sarcoma, and many influenza and parainfluenza types.

They found it effective against these bacteria and parasitic protozoans: lactobacillus plantarum W50, brevis 50, pediococcus cerevisiae 39, leuconostoc mesenteroides 42, staphylococcus aureus, bacillus subtilis, enterobacteraerogenes NRRL B-199, E. cloacae NRRL B-414, E. coli, salamonella tyhimurium, pseudomonas fluorescens, P. solanacearum, P. lachrymans, erwinia carotovora, E. tracheiphila, xanthomonas vesicatoria, corynesbacterium Michiganese, plasmodium falciparum, virax and malariae.

The researchers credit a number of unique properties possessed by the olive leaf compound for the broad killing power:

  • An ability to interfere with critical amino acid production essential for viruses.
  • An ability to contain viral infection and/or spread by inactivating viruses or by preventing virus shedding, budding or assembly at the cell membrane.
  • The ability to directly penetrate infected cells and stop viral replication.
  • In the case of retroviruses, it is able to neutralize the production of reverse transcriptase and protease. These enzymes are essential for a retrovirus, such as HIV, to alter the RNA of a healthy cell.
  • It can stimulate phagocytosis, an immune system response in which cells ingest harmful microorganisms and foreign matter.

The research suggests that this may be a "true anti-viral" compound because it appears to selectively block an entire virus-specific system in the infected host. It thus appears to offer healing effects not addressed by pharmaceutical antibiotics.

James R. Privitera, M.D., Olive Leaf Extract A New/Old Healing Bonanza for Mankind

Other popular natural antibiotics include garlic, echinacea and golden seal. Also, you should not overlook the role of vitamin C (usually by high-dose intravenous therapy in serious infections) in either directly providing antibiosis or, like the herbs mentioned already, assisting by boosting immune function to help the body help itself in combatting infections.

Natural antibiotics are powerful and effective and should be treated with great respect. Given the serious damage caused by pharmaceutical antibiotics, both at the individual and community levels, we are very fortunate to have natural antibiotics. I recommend that you take action to ensure your good health and avoid infections but if you do ever need an antibiotic I suggest you locate an enlightened doctor who will use natural antibiotics. If your infection is minor you may even be able to successfully treat yourself.